Payments News from Glenbrook Partners
Glenbrook   Book   Education   Jobs   Views   Archives   Store   Advertise   About         SUBSCRIBE:

Annals of Payments and Patents

Tags » Merchants, Patents  » Comments (0)

Brent Bowers reports for the New York Times on the recent decision in a patent litigation case between AdvanceMe and AmeriMerchant. In its decision in the case, the court found the patent to be invalid because it was "obvious and anticipated." AmeriMerchant's David Goldin is profiled in Bowers' article. Goldin also has his own blog - called the "Merchant Cash Advance Blog" where he provides more background on the litigation.

Add your comment... (note that all comments are reviewed before they're published)

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Payments News on Facebook
Glenbrook Partners

PAYMENTS NEWS IS PRODUCED BY AND IS A SERVICE MARK OF GLENBROOK PARTNERS, LLC
ISSN 1556-4487

Glenbrook's Consulting Services

  • Innovation and Strategy
  • Payments Product Development
  • Payments Market Assessments
  • Payments Vendor Selection
  • Merchant Payments Optimization
  • Payments Risk Management
  •  
  • To discuss how Glenbrook can
    help you
    , email us:

Glenbrook's Payments Education

  • Payments Boot Camps
  • Payments Essentials Webinars
  • Private Payments Workshops
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • For more information on Glenbrook's payments education, email us:

Tools for Payments Professionals

  • Glenbrook Writings
  • Payments News
  • Payments Views
  • Payments Jobs
  • Payments Education
  • Payments Bookstore
  •  
  • To send us news that you'd like us to cover on Payments News, email us:

Contacts:                        
Compilation Copyright © 2002 - 2012 Glenbrook Partners LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        RSS Feed        Payments News RSS Feed

Subscribe to Payments News   

Follow Payments News on Twitter for Real-Time Updates