Glenbrook's Report from the Chicago Fed's 2007 Payments Conference
Glenbrook's Carol Coye Benson attended The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago's sold-out 2007 Payments Conference this week. The theme of this year's conference was "Competitive Forces Shaping the Payments Environment: What's Next?." Click here to read Carol's full report.
Report from the Chicago Fed's 2007 Payments Conference by Carol Coye Benson
The Federal Reserve Bank's sold-out 2007 Payments Conference covered a lot
of material, but two key themes kept recurring:
- First, the debate on the future of checks is basically over: the number
of checks paid are dropping and those that are paid are going to either be
converted to ACH or cleared as images - we're well passed the tipping point
on this. The industry is anxiously waiting for the new Federal Reserve Bank
volume study (expected to be released in early 2008) to really nail down the
numbers, but the general mood is self-congratulatory: the industry set out
to get reduce paper and its expenses, and the goal is being met.
- Secondly, the hot topic - almost the only hot topic - is mobile
payments. The answer is "yes" - but we're still scrambling to figure out
what, exactly, the question is. The dialog seems to be much more
sophisticated this year - everybody here "gets" the basic models (remote
commerce, digital download, POS), understands the technology options (RFID,
NFC, SMS..), understands the inherent complexity of a multi-carrier,
multi-payment provider world, and understands the difference between mobile
banking and mobile payments. It seems like what we're waiting for now is
data coming out of the current trials to see what, exactly, customers are
going to like the most and use the most.
- Spencer White of Cingular/AT&T painted a clear picture of the role of
the carrier as managing the top-level customer interface for mobile payments
and other applications: a "front door for your money". He sees a parallel
to email and IM access via the mobile phone - Cingular found that when they
provided an integrated portal to multiple email and IM services (an email
"wallet"?) that consumer adoption increased by a factor of 10. Cingular is
running a number of financial services trials and partnerships (Wachovia,
SunTrust, Regions Financial, Bancorp South, and others) and he said that for
mobile banking, cell phone access is increasing the frequency of customer
access to banking: one bank sited an average access of 13 times per month
with PC online banking, and 17 times per month with mobile banking.
Interestingly, one bank has seen a 25% increase in the use of bill payment
among mobile banking customers. Spencer's discussion of partnerships
notably did not include Apple. I asked him about this after the panel - the
answer was basically that the iPhone deal, while significant, does not have
the carrier-managed customer interface, and is therefore the exception that
(maybe) proves his rule!
- Niki Manby of Visa USA provided some research results on consumer
attitudes towards mobile payments. The bottom line: a huge interest among
consumers in using phones for payment - and, among those interested in using
the phone for payments, a willingness (cited by 90% of those surveyed!) to
pay more for a device that enables this. She talked about where phones are
in the "cycle of innovation". To illustrate her point, she asked the
audience how many had "paid extra" for special features on their most recent
cell phone: most had. She then asked how many had "paid extra" for special
features on their mostly recently acquired payment card: none had! So food
for thought for the bankers - consumers are willing to pay - but will they
(the banks) get a share of this?
- There was a lively panel on cash alternatives. Norma Reyes, the
Commissioner for the City of Chicago responsible for taxi services, talked
about Chicago's implementation of a rule requiring cabs to accept cards for
payment, and the difficulties of getting a highly cash-oriented driver
community to accept the regulation. One helpful offset: tips are higher
when customers use cards! (But my cab driver still gave a big sigh when I
pulled out my card at the airport this afternoon.) Jim Turner of USA
Technologies gave an update on the vending machine industry's adoption of
contactless cards - early trials show an astonishing 32% increase in average
ticket value.
- Two panels addressed, from different angles, the "unbanked and under
banked" sectors. Listening to Hamed Shahbazi of TIO Networks talk about
kiosk bill payment, Jospeh Cachey of Western Union and James Maloney of
Mitchell Bank talk about new and improved remittance products, Dave Martin
of NCBS talking about plans for 430 Wal-Mart Money Centers, it seemed to me
that there are an awful lot of companies serving the "unserved". it may be
time that the industry changes terminology. The "otherwise served"?
- And finally, in an excellent keynote by Frank D'Angelo of Metavante, on
"Competition in the Payments Space", he noted that there are now more hedge
funds than banks in the U.S.! Now that's worth thinking about!






The future of paper checks in the system may be clear but it seems the future of payments using Check images and ACH is not clear at least not from the literature I have been able to find.
How do you see the trend for payments using images or ACH in the future?
Posted by: O. Sam Ackley | May 12, 2007 at 07:45 AM
Thanks for this excellent summary Carol, especially the point about taxi drivers. I remember being told years ago that one of the problems introducing the Proton e-purse in Belgium was that such a large part of Belgium's economy is "black" because of high taxes that the costs of taking the e-purse instead of cash was closer to 50% than the 1% transaction fee!
Posted by: Dave Birch | May 14, 2007 at 04:57 AM