About   Advertise   Archives   Education   Glenbrook   Jobs   Store   Views   Subscribe:

Glenbrook's Report from the Chicago Fed's 2007 Payments Conference

Tags » Financial Regulators, Glenbrook  » Comments (2)

Glenbrook's Carol Coye Benson attended The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago's sold-out 2007 Payments Conference this week. The theme of this year's conference was "Competitive Forces Shaping the Payments Environment: What's Next?." Click here to read Carol's full report.

Report from the Chicago Fed's 2007 Payments Conference by Carol Coye Benson

The Federal Reserve Bank's sold-out 2007 Payments Conference covered a lot
of material, but two key themes kept recurring:

  • First, the debate on the future of checks is basically over: the number
    of checks paid are dropping and those that are paid are going to either be
    converted to ACH or cleared as images - we're well passed the tipping point
    on this. The industry is anxiously waiting for the new Federal Reserve Bank
    volume study (expected to be released in early 2008) to really nail down the
    numbers, but the general mood is self-congratulatory: the industry set out
    to get reduce paper and its expenses, and the goal is being met.
  • Secondly, the hot topic - almost the only hot topic - is mobile
    payments. The answer is "yes" - but we're still scrambling to figure out
    what, exactly, the question is. The dialog seems to be much more
    sophisticated this year - everybody here "gets" the basic models (remote
    commerce, digital download, POS), understands the technology options (RFID,
    NFC, SMS..), understands the inherent complexity of a multi-carrier,
    multi-payment provider world, and understands the difference between mobile
    banking and mobile payments. It seems like what we're waiting for now is
    data coming out of the current trials to see what, exactly, customers are
    going to like the most and use the most.
There were several excellent panel discussions. Some highlights:
  • Spencer White of Cingular/AT&T painted a clear picture of the role of
    the carrier as managing the top-level customer interface for mobile payments
    and other applications: a "front door for your money". He sees a parallel
    to email and IM access via the mobile phone - Cingular found that when they
    provided an integrated portal to multiple email and IM services (an email
    "wallet"?) that consumer adoption increased by a factor of 10. Cingular is
    running a number of financial services trials and partnerships (Wachovia,
    SunTrust, Regions Financial, Bancorp South, and others) and he said that for
    mobile banking, cell phone access is increasing the frequency of customer
    access to banking: one bank sited an average access of 13 times per month
    with PC online banking, and 17 times per month with mobile banking.
    Interestingly, one bank has seen a 25% increase in the use of bill payment
    among mobile banking customers. Spencer's discussion of partnerships
    notably did not include Apple. I asked him about this after the panel - the
    answer was basically that the iPhone deal, while significant, does not have
    the carrier-managed customer interface, and is therefore the exception that
    (maybe) proves his rule!
  • Niki Manby of Visa USA provided some research results on consumer
    attitudes towards mobile payments. The bottom line: a huge interest among
    consumers in using phones for payment - and, among those interested in using
    the phone for payments, a willingness (cited by 90% of those surveyed!) to
    pay more for a device that enables this. She talked about where phones are
    in the "cycle of innovation". To illustrate her point, she asked the
    audience how many had "paid extra" for special features on their most recent
    cell phone: most had. She then asked how many had "paid extra" for special
    features on their mostly recently acquired payment card: none had! So food
    for thought for the bankers - consumers are willing to pay - but will they
    (the banks) get a share of this?
  • There was a lively panel on cash alternatives. Norma Reyes, the
    Commissioner for the City of Chicago responsible for taxi services, talked
    about Chicago's implementation of a rule requiring cabs to accept cards for
    payment, and the difficulties of getting a highly cash-oriented driver
    community to accept the regulation. One helpful offset: tips are higher
    when customers use cards! (But my cab driver still gave a big sigh when I
    pulled out my card at the airport this afternoon.) Jim Turner of USA
    Technologies gave an update on the vending machine industry's adoption of
    contactless cards - early trials show an astonishing 32% increase in average
    ticket value.
  • Two panels addressed, from different angles, the "unbanked and under
    banked" sectors. Listening to Hamed Shahbazi of TIO Networks talk about
    kiosk bill payment, Jospeh Cachey of Western Union and James Maloney of
    Mitchell Bank talk about new and improved remittance products, Dave Martin
    of NCBS talking about plans for 430 Wal-Mart Money Centers, it seemed to me
    that there are an awful lot of companies serving the "unserved". it may be
    time that the industry changes terminology. The "otherwise served"?
  • And finally, in an excellent keynote by Frank D'Angelo of Metavante, on
    "Competition in the Payments Space", he noted that there are now more hedge
    funds than banks in the U.S.
    ! Now that's worth thinking about!



Add your comment... (note that all comments are reviewed before they're published)

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The future of paper checks in the system may be clear but it seems the future of payments using Check images and ACH is not clear at least not from the literature I have been able to find.

How do you see the trend for payments using images or ACH in the future?

Thanks for this excellent summary Carol, especially the point about taxi drivers. I remember being told years ago that one of the problems introducing the Proton e-purse in Belgium was that such a large part of Belgium's economy is "black" because of high taxes that the costs of taking the e-purse instead of cash was closer to 50% than the 1% transaction fee!

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Sponsors

News View

Payments Consultants

Subscribe

Search

Languages



Glenbrook Partners

PAYMENTS NEWS IS PRODUCED BY AND IS A SERVICE MARK OF GLENBROOK PARTNERS, LLC
ISSN 1556-4487

Glenbrook's Consulting Services

  • Innovation and Strategy
  • Payments Product Development
  • Payments Market Assessments
  • Payments Vendor Selection
  • Merchant Payments Optimization
  • Payments Risk Management
  •  
  • To discuss how Glenbrook can
    help you
    , email us:

Glenbrook's Payments Education

  • Payments Boot Camp
  • Emerging Payments Roundtables
  • Special Focus Workshops
  • Private Payments Workshops
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • For more information on Glenbrook's payments education, email us:

Tools for Payments Professionals

  • Glenbrook Writings
  • Payments News
  • Payments Jobs
  • Payments Education
  • Payments Bookstore
  • Payments Glossary
  •  
  • To send us news that you'd like us to cover on Payments News, email us:

Contacts:                        
Compilation Copyright © 2002 - 2009 Glenbrook Partners LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        RSS Feed        Payments News RSS Feed

Subscribe to Payments News   

Follow Payments News on Twitter for Real-Time Updates