Enterprises Can't Rely On Social Security Numbers For Identity
Gartner in a press release this morning says that "recent thefts of personal data from companies and government agencies make it clear that Social Security numbers can no longer be relied on as proof of identity."
Gartner analysts said enterprises should use this data as only part of an overall "identity score."Avivah Litan, vice president and distinguished analyst at Gartner, recently testified at the oversight hearings for the Committee on Veteran's Affairs regarding the theft of sensitive information belonging to 26.5 million veterans and spouses from a Veteran Affairs employee's home. Ms. Litan told the committee that this latest compromise shows just how unprotected some of the nation's most sensitive data is.
"This incident also shows that the Social Security number has become an extremely unreliable piece of information and cannot be trusted to be unique to an individual. Companies should not rely on Social Security numbers alone as proof of individual identity," Ms. Litan said. "As many as one-in-seven adult Social Security numbers in the U.S. may already have been compromised."
"A company with at least 10,000 accounts to protect can spend, in the first year, as little as $6 per customer account for just data encryption, or as much as $16 per customer account for data encryption, host-based intrusion prevention and strong security audits combined," Ms. Litan said. "This compares with an expenditure of at least $90 per customer account when data is compromised or exposed during a breach."
Encrypting stored data can provide the most robust data protection, but if that is unfeasible because of undue cost and complexity, companies should deploy comprehensive host-based intrusion prevention systems (HIPS). However, successfully deploying HIPS requires strong server configuration control and additional administrative cost and complexity. Another option is strong security audits to validate that the organization has deployed satisfactory mitigating controls, reducing the need for data encryption or HIPS.
"None of these options are mutually exclusive, but implementing all three will still be less expensive than having to respond to a large-scale data breach," Ms. Litan said.





Add your comment... (note that all comments are reviewed before they're published)